The discussion will examine the Attlee government’s original conception of the Convention – often imagined as a limited safeguard against totalitarianism rather than a foundation for a far-reaching supranational court. The seminar will investigate the historical divergence between these initial intentions and the subsequent expansion of the Strasbourg Court’s authority. Key questions to be addressed include: To what extent does the modern ECHR reflect the assumptions of its British drafters? And does the claim of a “British legacy” still offer a valid basis for the UK’s commitment to the Convention, or does it overlook how significantly the system has evolved over the past seventy-five years?

The session will delve into the evolution of the ECHR from a safeguard against totalitarianism into a broad legal order capable of reshaping domestic law. Participants will discuss whether the historical narrative of British authorship can still sustain the UK’s commitment to the Convention, or if the divergence between 1950 and the present day requires a fundamental rethinking of this relationship.

Guest: Yuan Yi Zhu – Assistant Professor at Leiden University, specializing in UK and Commonwealth constitutional law, judicial power, and public law history. 

Date: 10 January  2026, 5:30 pm

Venue: Budapest, 1113 Tas vezér utca 3-7., Kinizsi Pál Room

 

----------------------------------------------

MCC students can earn credit for actively participating in the event, provided they read the required chapters and paper(s) and prepare three questions for the Q&A session of the research seminar.

Questions related to the required reading must be submitted to Kálmán Pócza at pocza.kalman@mcc.hu by 11:00 PM on 18 January, 2026.

Required Reading: Please contact Kálmán Pócza to obtain the electronic version of the paper.

Submission Deadline: 18 January 2026, 11:00 PM

 

Previous Research Seminars: