MCC Brussels Dissects the German Elections

The intense election campaign reflected deep concerns about the country’s future—economic instability, migration challenges, and security threats, including terrorism. National and European security also loomed large, with 45% of Germans saying their vote would shape peace and stability in Europe.

In a dynamic session of the MCC Brussels Live Podcast, host Jacob Reynolds led a sharp debate on the election’s impact. Panelists Sabine Beppler-Spahl, Director of the FreiblickInstitut Berlin, Frank Füredi, Executive Director of MCC Brussels, and Alexander Jungbluth, Member of European Parliament for AfD, shared diverse perspectives on Germany’s evolving political landscape.

Sabine Beppler-Spahl contended that the government is exploiting "defensive democracy" to suppress dissent by broadly criminalizing criticism—especially the critical voices raised around immigration policies. She warned that such measures curtail free speech, stifle open debate, and alienate voters. This repression, she argued, undermines constitutional rights.

Frank Füredi highlighted Germany’s severe economic distress. He pointed to rising energy costs, the fallout from abandoning nuclear power, and mounting industrial challenges. Furedi called for bold reforms—from streamlining bureaucracy to incentivizing local innovation—to reverse the economic downturn.

Alexander Jungbluth provided insight into the evolving political landscape. He discussed how long-standing party loyalties are dissolving, with voters increasingly gravitating towards alternative political narratives. Jungbluth warned that a fragile coalition, even with a slight majority, might struggle to enact decisive policies, potentially paving the way for future minority governments.

During the event’s Q&A, the panelists addressed audience concerns over migration, economic strategy, and foreign intervention. Some people said that while strict migration policies might yield short-term political gains, they could also jeopardize social cohesion and long-term economic stability. Discussing the international aspects of the election, the speakers dismissed the notion that external influences—be it from figures like Elon Musk or political maneuvers abroad—could provide lasting solutions to Germany’s internal challenges. Instead, they stressed the balanced approach to reform.

The discussion concluded on a cautiously optimistic note. The panelists acknowledged that while the election results have unsettled Germany’s political status quo, they also present an opportunity for renewed discourse and meaningful policy shifts. As the country grapples with complex economic and social challenges, the insights shared by Beppler-Spahl, Furedi, and Jungbluth highlight a critical moment for reflection and reform in Germany’s political journey.

The results of the elections may bring changes to German politics, but the country still has a long way to go on the issue of freedom of speech. It will be the responsibility of the new government to ensure that Germany is not only a democracy in name, but remains a place of free expression and open debate.